EN | FR

Insurance, Investments and Group Benefits

Simple. Fast. Easy.®

Milestones and the importance of discipline

Investment Views, Investments

Posted by Henry So, CFA

Sep 12, 2019 11:00:00 AM

Senior Investment Product Manager
Empire Life Investments Inc.
Gestionnaire principal, Produits de placement
Placements Empire Vie

Milestones and the importance of discipline

In November of this year, the Empire Life Elite Equity Fund will celebrate its 50th anniversary.1 This milestone is a celebration not only of longevity but also of long-term performance results. 

Over its history to date (from November 30, 1969, to August 31, 2019), a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the Fund would have grown to $863,133. That’s an annualized return of 9.4% (net of its management expense ratio). In comparison, a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the S&P/TSX Composite Index (the “Index”) would have grown to just $742,272.
 

From a portfolio management point of view, adopting a value-oriented approach to stock selection among high-quality companies has been a key factor in the Fund’s success. Other important elements are taking a long-term view on the Fund’s underlying investments and trusting in the process, especially in periods when the market is not favoring your style.

 

We are often taught that staying invested is important for long-term
success, but how important is it?
We are often taught that staying invested is important for long-term success, but how important is it?

 

A disciplined approach is equally important (if not more so) to an investor’s success with the Fund. We are often taught that staying invested is important for long-term success, but how important is it? With that hypothetical $10,000 investment mentioned above, missing out on just the best single month in the Fund’s performance history would have resulted in a significantly decreased value of $757,077. That’s a difference of over $100,000 (or ten times the original investment) for missing just one month. Missing out on the top two months would have resulted in a $666,944 value (and underperforming the Index), and missing out on the top three months would have resulted in a $591,181 value.

While these results are dramatic and perhaps eye-opening, it might be argued these scenarios are not particularly realistic. The likelihood of randomly picking only the top three performing months (out of 597) not to be invested is perhaps as slim as picking winning lottery numbers, but with detrimental results.
 

Perhaps a more realistic example based on investor behavior needs to be examined. Investors are more likely to sell a fund after it significantly underperforms for an extended period, and buy into a fund after it outperforms for an extended period. Hypothetical Investor A invests $10,000 in the Elite Equity Fund at inception and usually remains invested, but is occasionally swayed by significant under and over performance over a longer period. After the Fund underperformed the Index by 28.6% at the end of February 1980 (its worst twelve-month stretch of relative performance) Investor A sold the Fund, believing the portfolio managers had lost their touch. Over the next twelve months, however, the Fund bounced back and outperformed the Index by 39.3%. Having realized selling was perhaps a mistake, Investor A reinvested in the Elite Equity Fund.

About two decades later, the Fund experienced its second-worst twelve-month stretch of relative performance. At the end of August 2000, the Fund trailed the Index by 27.3%. Having perhaps forgotten the lessons of the past, Investor A again decided to sell the Fund due to its “poor performance.” As the tech bubble burst in the following months, the Fund once again outperformed the Index, with a 23% cumulative advantage by August 2001. Investor A finally learned their lesson, reinvested in the Fund, and stayed there for good.

With only two poorly timed (yet understandable) reactions over an almost 50-year stretch, the impact is significant. Investor A is left with a value of $674,353 at the end of August 2019, which is $188,780 less than the buy-and-hold strategy.

 

The following chart illustrates the various scenarios.

Growth of $10,000: Nov 1969- Aug 2019, in thousands

(data source: Morningstar Direct, Nov 1969 – Aug 2019)

 

Examining the difference in market values between the Index and the various scenarios starkly shows the impact of the ill-timed decisions.

Growth of $10,000 Relative to Index: Nov 1969 - Aug 2019, in thousands

(data source: Morningstar Direct, Nov 1969 – Aug 2019)

 

In summary, sound and disciplined investment strategies by investment professionals can lead to strong fund performance over the long term. The portfolios manager’s skill, however, may be easily undone if the investor is not equally disciplined. “Stay invested” is a mantra many of us are familiar with, and our example quantifies the potential damage that can be done by not having the discipline to do so.


1Class A units.

This blog reflects the views of the author as of the date stated. This information should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell nor should it be relied upon as investment, tax or legal advice. Empire Life and its affiliates does not warrant or make any representations regarding the use or the results of the information contained herein in terms of its correctness, accuracy, timeliness, reliability, or otherwise, and does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage that results from its use.  

September 2019

SHARE THIS POST